The purpose of this assessment is to provide you with an opportunity to apply your critical thinking skills. This requires you to write an argumentative essay in the context of innovation management. Your essay is written from the perspective of a university student who is studying the management of innovation. In the essay, you will apply critical thinking skills to argue a specific point of view regarding the practice of innovation. Assessment details You will learn from this 12-module course that the management of innovation within the corporate context (medium to large enterprises) is a multi-faceted endeavour that occurs at all levels within the organisation. Demonstration of that learning will require you to apply critical thinking as you argue to show understanding of the many, often competing, viewpoints. One such viewpoint is that innovation is complex, uncertain, and almost impossible to manage. Your task is to write an argumentative essay in which you critically argue in favour of, or against, the above (underlined) viewpoint. This assessment requires that you focus your arguments on the challenges (and remedies?) associated with the various sub-sets of managing innovation. To be clear, arguments must be balanced across all four modules, which is reflected in the marking rubric. Select specific concepts, models, theories, frameworks, or tools that you found particularly useful to support those arguments. Critical thinking requires you to make arguments rather than describe materials covered in this course. In those arguments, draw on specific examples of your learnings from each of the first four Modules of this course. As you argue, apply relevant specialist terminology and demonstrate relevance to contemporary creativity and innovation practices. Where possible and appropriate, support your arguments with real-world industry examples.
Answer to question 1
Thinking is a natural process. It just happens; you don’t have to make it so. But there are other ways you may make it happen. Think either positively or badly, for instance. Both rational judgement and “heart” thinking are valid modes of thought. Additionally, you have the ability to think logically, tactically, quantitatively, and scientifically. These are only a few of the numerous ways the mind might handle ideas.
It is your responsibility as a college student to challenge and develop your thinking abilities. Critical thinking is among these abilities’ most crucial components. Because it applies to almost all jobs, circumstances, themes, vocations, surroundings, problems, and opportunities, critical thinking is crucial. It is not limited to a specific subject.
written by hand poster. Norms for Critical Thinking in… speaking, perusing, writing, blogging, and surviving: Ask questions of authors and others; use complete sentences, proper punctuation, and capital letters; support your claims with text proof (because…) and examples from your life or the world; express your agreement and disagreement with others and authors. agree and disagree with others and writers; provide reasons for your opinions; use entire sentences when speaking and writing; and support your opinions. answers questions without providing justification; agrees and disagrees without explaining why; uses incomplete phrases and improper punctuation.
Doesn’t participate in the discussion, doesn’t share your viewpoint, and doesn’t concur or disagree with others. Justify means to support your arguments with examples, data, and logic.
Making decisions about what to believe or do requires critical thinking, which is clear, reasonable, and analytical thinking. It entails posing insightful queries like, “How do we know?” Alternatively, “Is this true in all cases or just in this one?” Instead of just remembering information or accepting everything you hear or read without question, it entails exercising scepticism and challenging presumptions.
Think about reading a history book, for instance. You question who authored it and why since you can tell that certain presumptions were made. You discover that the author’s research has a narrow focus, concentrating exclusively on one section of the population. Your use of critical thinking in this situation demonstrates that there are “alternative sides to the story.”
People who are critical thinkers are typically inquisitive and self-aware. They enjoy delving further into unfamiliar territory in search of understanding, clarification, and fresh approaches. They analyse claims and arguments, make distinctions between fact and opinion, and pose significant questions. Additionally, they are open to questioning their own views and have a humility that enables them to acknowledge ignorance or a lack of understanding when necessary. They’re willing to have their minds changed. They actively like learning, and they make it a lifelong quest to learn new things.
This might very well be you!
You can always improve your critical thinking abilities, no matter where you are in the process. By doing this, you’ll be able to read critically, write clearly, and articulate yourself while developing more well-rounded arguments. Your ability to think critically will be useful in any field, including science, the arts, business, and education.
Fundamentally, critical thinking is the process of challenging facts and information. You can doubt the data you read in a textbook, or you might doubt what a politician, a professor, or a fellow student says. You can challenge an accepted notion or a novel concept. Anything and everything is open to inquiry and scrutiny when using critical thinking.
Relationship between Critical Thinking and Logic
The word logic, which means the science or art of reasoning, is derived from the Ancient Greek word logike. A person assesses arguments and seeks to differentiate between sound and flawed reasoning, or between truth and deception, using logic. You can assess arguments or assertions made by others, come at wise conclusions, and develop solid worldviews using logic.
Critical thinking: Logical Issues
Let’s provide a clear illustration of how to employ logic in a circumstance that requires critical thinking. In this fictitious instance, a man who holds a PhD in political science works as a professor at a nearby university. His wife also has a job there. Their family is well known in the neighbourhood, and they have three young children enrolled in the nearby school system.
The individual is currently vying for a governmental position. Are his qualifications and experience sufficient for a position in government? Will he be successful in his political position? Some voters might decide to support him because they think that, on the surface, his personal life and current employment indicate that he will perform well in the role.
A regular day for most people is chock full of opportunities for critical thought and problem solution. In actuality, problem-solving and critical thinking go hand in hand. They both refer to applying information, data, and knowledge to solve issues successfully. However, while solving a problem, you must precisely define, pick, and argue your solution. Here are some instances of applying critical thinking to solve problems:
Your connection was strained as a result of your roommate’s irate statements that she said to you. You make an effort to see past the aggressive actions to ascertain how you might finest assist your roommate and aid in repairing your friendship.
Young man in black jacket, in the foreground of a crowded street scene, with thoughtful expression.
Your campus group has been struggling due to a lack of members and funding. However, the new club president is a marketing major and has come up with a few ideas to entice students to join and support the club. Implementation is about to happen.
Your last art project pushes you to think about shape in novel ways. When the students submit their projects on the last day of class, you go over the methods you employed to complete the assignment. You provide an explanation of your decision-making process.
Your math teacher notices that a concept is being poorly understood by the class. She employs deft inquiry to allay your concerns and lead you to a fresh understanding of the idea.
You have a job interview for a position for which you believe you are only half qualified, despite the fact that you are eager to start and genuinely want the position. You consider how best to demonstrate your abilities and experiences in order to convince the potential employer that you are a good fit.
You’re doing well in college, and the majority of your living expenses are taken care of. However, there are some discrepancies between your desires and what you believe you can afford. To more accurately estimate how much money you will need to continue attending college and keep your preferred level of spending, you assess your income, savings, and budget.
Answer to question 2
Answer to question 3
Answer to question 4